Slide Projectors and Accessories

归类于: Uncategorized — tyning at 11:00 pm on 星期六, 三月 31, 2007

******* This article is copied from http://www.underwater.org/mermaid/information_projectors.html for personal use. All credits belong to mermaid underwater photographic. **********

Projectors:

The Kodak Carousel projector is ubiquitous, at least in the United States. I’d recommend that anyone planning to show their slides publicly buy a Carousel, Medalist, or Ektagraphic.

There are several lines of Kodak projectors:

The Carousel projectors are the home/consumer line. The current series have four digit model numbers. They have a one year warranty.

The Medalist AF is a heavier duty consumer projector. It comes with a three year warranty.

The Ektagraphics intended for professional and A/V work. Although they look similar to the Carousels some internal parts are different. The current projectors are the Ektagraphic III series. They carry a four year warranty.

The Ektapro is even higher end, and I’m not sufficiently familiar with them (out of my budget).

The Ektalight models are similar to the Ektagraphic III models and are not available in the US.

The advantages of the Ektagraphics are:

  • They have extra heat dissipation, and therefore can use brighter bulbs.
  • The light is more even, especially in the corners.
  • They have more tighter registration- slides show up in the same place on the screen. This is important when using multiple projectors and a dissolve unit.
  • The autofocus models have a switch so you can turn autofocus on and off.

The disadvantages of Ektagraphics are:

  • The fan runs faster with a higher pitched noise.
  • They are more expensive.

The Ektagraphic III series projectors are currently available in four models, the IIIe plus, IIIa, IIIamt, and IIIats. Kodak also made the IIIam, IIIas, IIIb, and IIIe which are not currently in production but may be available used.

The IIIe is the basic projector (the economy version), no auto or remote focus. The IIIb is the earlier version of the IIIe plus which has manual remote focus.

Kodak also makes two projectors which are switchable for 110 or 220 volts, the IIIbr and IIIabr.

The rest of the III series can be understood by looking at the letters in the name:

A

Autofocus

So a IIIa is the basic autofocus projector, while a IIIamt adds remote manual and a timer. IIIats does, by the way, have remote manual. They don’t use all four letters in the suffix.

There are four models of Carousel available, the 4200, 4400, 4600, and 5600. And there are three models which are no longer in production. There is no obvious correspondence between the model numbers and the features, except that higher numbers have more features. Here’s a quick chart:

Carousel

Ektagraphic

Features

The IIIb model was replaced by the IIIe plus, but the features did not change. The IIIam and IIIas were discontinued.

The Medalist AF is has the same features as the Carousel 4600 . It has a grey base instead of black and a three conductor power cord. It is built using some Ektagraphic parts such as the fan motor. And it has a longer warranty.

The current Extagraphic and 4000/5000 series projectors were introduced in 1982. There have been a few changes to them over the years. Originally the lamp module was behind a door which folded down. On most early projectors this door was gray. A revision to the design changed this so the door was part of the lamp module and pulled out with it. This lamp module door was black. The latest change was to incorporate a bright lamp module. This module can be recognized by the words “Extra Bright” on the back. The color of the projectors was changed from gray or black to beige. If you are looking at a used projector this can give you some indication as to the age. And if you are looking at a new projector it can help you to make sure you are purchasing the latest version.

If you are looking for a used projector, Kodak made other Carousels before the current series. These had three digit model numbers. The earliest had 500 watt bulbs. The later models had 300 watt halogen bulbs which were brighter and cooler. The model numbers did not change except that Kodak added the letter H after the number. So a Carousel 650 would have a 500 watt bulb and a Carousel 650H would have a 300 watt bulb. These bulbs are not interchangable and it is not possible to update a non-halogen projector.

Here are the model numbers and features:

Original

Halogen

Features

The early non-Halogen Carousels are old and ran very hot. They are not a good choice for a used projector.

The Ektagraphic II series were the commercial versions of the above and may be a good choice.

The The Ektagraphic E-2 was the simplest. It had manual focus and a remote.

The The Ektagraphic B-2 added remote focus.

The Ektagraphic AF-1 had autofocus but no remote focus or timer.

The AF-2 had autofocus and a timer. There were several versions of the AF-2. Some had an autofocus on/off switch and on some the timer was electronic instead of mechanical.

The Ektagraphic AF-3 was like the AF-2 but it had a remote ON/OFF switch. This required a special remote control, the EC-4.

There were some even earlier models, the Carousel 500 and 550. These are from the 1960s and are much larger and heavier than the projectors which replaced them. They also used 500 watt bulbs.

There are also some non-Kodak projectors which take Carousels. You might find a used Singer or Telex Caramate. Leica sold a projector which looked the same as the Caramate only with their brand name on it. Although these projectors use the same remotes as the Kodak projectors some dissolves will not work with them. Elmo, Leica, Navitar, Simda, and Telex are among the manufacturers of Carousel compatible projectors. These are meant for commercial use and are expensive new.

Autofocus is a major feature on the more expensive projectors. If you are using a single projector to show your slides and they are not all in the same slide mounts, autofocus can be wonderful.

If you are using more than one projector and a dissolve autofocus can interfere with the smooth transition between slides. In this case it is best to mount all the slides in the same type of mount and turn autofocus off.

Lenses:

All Carousel and Ektagraphic projectors use the same lens mount. Autofocus is done within the projector so it works with any lens.

Lenses come in two types, flat field and curved field. The curved field lenses are designed to project slides which are not in glass mounts. They attempt to compensate for the curvature of the slide film. Flat field lenses are designed for slides which are not curved, for example those mounted between two pieces of glass.

At the PMA show in 1995 Kodak changed their lens recommendation. They now recommend flat field lenses for general purpose and home slide viewing. This is because newer films are flatter and because of available mounts. Curved field lenses are at their best only with original slides machine-mounted in cardboard.

There are a number of companies which make lenses for Carousel projectors. Here are a few to watch (or watch out) for.

Kodak makes the most common lenses. They are available in flat field and curved field. The 102-152 C (curved field) zoom is very popular, as is the 100-150mm flat field zoom. There are also non-zooms available, these tend to be brighter.

Kodak lenses are light and cheap, but not terribly sharp, especially the 102-152 zoom. This isn’t surprising - if you bought a zoom lens for your camera for under $100 would you expect great performance? I have been told that the 100-150 flat field is not as bad as the 102-152 curved field.

Kodak also makes a series of more expensive lenses, the Ektapro Select. These are much higher quality. I have seen them in use and the resulting images were quite sharp. Their prices are competitive with other premium lenses. I’ve never heard of a used Select lens.

Navitar makes some really nice lenses. I use three 70-125mm flat field zoom lenses when I do three projector shows. I also have three 6-9″ zooms which I use for large rooms. There are several series of Navitar lenses, and I’ve seen the older 70-125 zoom sell for under $100 used and Golden Navitar zoom lenses that were still in the original box and plastic wrap go for $150. These lenses are so much sharper than the standard Kodak zooms that slides which are not in glass mounts look sharper with flat field Navitars than with curved field Kodaks. Navitar also makes fixed length lenses and longer zooms. New, they are very expensive.

Buhl also makes high quality lenses. I have several 7″ Buhl lenses, including a matched set which I use when I know they will be the correct length. Buhl lenses are often less expensive than Navitars. I know someone who compared a fixed Navitar against a fixed Buhl, could see no difference, and bought the Buhl for $100 less. Things may change because Navitar has purchased Buhl.

Schneider makes several lines of lenses. The lower cost Prolux lenses are very good for their price and the Cinelux lenses are excellent.

I’ve only had one experience with Raynox lenses. They are supposed to be pretty good, but I was very dissapointed. However these had been beaten up in A/V service.

ISCO is actually the same company as Schneider. They sell a line of lenses under that name. I have a couple ISCO 70-125mm perspective correction lenses which I sometimes use at home.

Leica lenses have a good reputation. Many of their lenses will not fit a Kodak projector so check before you buy.

Slide mounts:

The first question about mounts is whether to use glass mounts. These sandwich the slide between two pieces of glass, keeping them nice and flat.

I don’t usually use glass mounts because they are fragile and I am clumsy. Also you have to be careful about temperature and humidity when traveling with glass mounts if you don’t want to see moisture when you show your slides. I have done shows which have slides that are on the screen for more than 30 seconds. We glass mounted the slides because otherwise they would go out of focus as they became warm and expanded.

Charlotte and I use Wess plastic mounts (AGX-002), as they are easy to put slides in and are heavy enough that they drop reliably. They are a bit more expensive than some of the other choices though, and I recommend you check out Gepe mounts.

I don’t have experience with the Hama slide mounts but have not had problems with popping in slide shows using the Wess mounts, with the one exception mentioned above.

We don’t have pin-registered cameras, and sometimes we need to have several slides line up. In that case we use the Wess VR mounts (AVX-002). These mounts have two extra positioning pins. Wess sells a punch that puts two holes in the slides near the sprocket holes (far outside the viewable area). Charlotte is very good at getting the punched images to line up.

If you are going to remount slides, you may also want a device that makes it easier to get slides out of the Kodak paper mounts. Wess sells one that has a razor blade in a little jig that holds the slide mount. Practice on a few slides you don’t care about.

Projector stands:

When I started doing multiple projector slide shows I learned that setting the projectors on a table there was no way to keep them aligned. Even if I were to line them up perfectly and threaten to kill anyone who came near the table somehow a gremlin would sneak up when I wasn’t looking and move one projector a little bit.

I finally bought a projector stand. Chief stands are the best I’ve seen. They are expensive - a three projector stand is hundreds of dollars, but they are available used.

Bright Lamps

The original Carousel projectors used two condensers and a heat absorber. The H series used only one condenser. There are no bright lamp modules available for these projectors.

The lamp module for the Ektagraphic III and Carousel 4000/5000 series had a condenser, a mirror, and a greenish piece of heat absorbing glass. In 1996 Kodak introduced their bright lamp module. The difference between the old module and the new brighter module is that the new module has no heat absorbing glass but the mirror is a different material and does not transmit heat. Also the aluminum is black instead of silver colored.

For years Navitar has made modules which replace the standard lamp modules in Ektagraphic projectors. They list for over four hundred dollars each, and typically sell for around $379. The Kodak modules cost around $95. and can be used to upgrade the Carousel 4000/5000, Medalist, and Ektagraphic III projectors (except for the early projectors with the hinged door).

Title slides:

You can make a program look more professional by using title slides. There are lots of ways to make them. The easiest way is to run them on a film recorder. If you don’t have one and you don’t want to pay $5.00 each for a service bureau to make them check out my page about special slides.

Credits:

Some of the information on this page was supplied by Ken Kobylenski of KX Camera. Ken sells used projectors, lenses, and dissolve units for audio-visual slide shows.

Information was also supplied by Frank Killam.

And some information came from Kodak. Their website describes the current Kodak projectors and lenses.

Back to information Back to slide show assistance Back to home page

This page sponsored by Mermaid Underwater Photographic. Contact us at mermaid@underwater.org.

Last modified 16 March 2004

 

Tyning论镜头(Canon 高级穷人篇)

归类于: Uncategorized — tyning at 2:57 pm on 星期二, 三月 13, 2007

昨天翻查自己在bbs上被m的帖子往blog里面倒,发现我还有个三个月前开了个头的轮镜头系列。其实大家都知道我没用过什么好东西,就是会低水平忽悠,不过这东西既然开了头,最好还是硬着头皮写下去。

以前还当版主的,所以充大尾巴狼弄了个标题叫做版主论镜头,以装出一点可怜的权威状。现在不是版主了,这个唬人的幌子没了,估计更是难写了。

上次说了C+穷人三件套,这次就来说说对于不满足三件套的穷人,该怎么办。

数码时代发展了好几年,FF的价格依然是居高不下,主流还是1.6x(对于C+来说) 。随着圆厂副厂的aps-c幅面的镜头不断推出,原先一些面向中高级业余用户的镜头身价一落千丈,但是只要你换一个角度来考虑焦段,拿这些镜头来用就非常超值。下面简单的介绍几支:(长焦方面准备以后专门写一篇侃侃。现在新出的新焦段的镜头也准备另讲 )。

中焦段:

EF 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM

这支镜头在大部分焦段成像能力和比它贵接近1000刀的佳能新贵24-105L非常接近,甚至在伯仲之间。镜头做工良好,使用环形usm马达,对焦迅速准确,在这方面和Canon的L级镜头丝毫不差。这支镜头新品大约240美元左右,200美元以下就可以在ebay或者keh买到基本上是like new的二手,性价比非常高。
EF 28-135/3.5-5.6 USM IS

这个基本上就是前者的焦段延长和IS版本,在胶片时代基本上是Canon中级用户人人必选的当红花旦,无奈现在已经是昨日黄花了。镜头使用Canon第一代IS技术,提供两级快门的防抖能力,虽然不如现在在24-105L上使用的新IS技术,但是绝大多数情况下足够用。这个镜头的美中不足就是135端光圈太小。现在新品大约$400出头,并且每次必进Canon rebate list,可以考虑用rebate买。

第三支是EF 24-85/3.5-4.5

这支镜头相比前两者基本上就是牺牲了长焦,换取24mm的广角,其他的区别不大。不过在1.6x上,无论是24mm还是28mm都远远不够广。而且考虑到这支镜头比28-105还要贵,就不是那么值了。

下面说说两个超值的副厂镜头,都是腾龙(Tamron)的。原因是在副厂里,大家一致认为做工方面Tokina>Tamron>Sigma,而在光学方面,至少在广角,中焦焦段,Tamron>Sigma>Tokina。所以相对来说,Tamron的最超值。

一个是Tamron 17-35mm/2.8-4,型号A05

这支镜头做工,画质方面都非常不错。画质好到什么程度呢,我有一支二手的like new,从keh买的。和Canon 17-40L side by side对比,一点都不输,甚至还好些。抗逆光方面也没有什么问题。这支镜头因为Tamron推出了aps专用的17-50/2.8以后逐渐失宠,原来定价499的镜头现在降到299了。可能是因为tamron逐渐将它减产,并且降价以后性价比大增,所以现在据说很不容易买到了。这支镜头现在基本上是300刀以下唯一的保持兼容全画幅的aps广角头。再往上就是Canon 17-40L了,价钱贵了一倍多。
另一支镜头则更加著名,大名鼎鼎的tamron A09

这支镜头2004年一出来就备受关注,2.8的全程恒定大光圈,仅67mm的直径。300多克的重量,比C/N对应的镜头轻一半,画质水平不说并驾齐驱也是非常接近。难怪一推出就获得2004年的欧洲镜头大奖,而且各方面的评测都是赞口不绝。我曾经买过一支,收到f/4以后锐不可当,全面压倒Canon的24-105L。不过我后来看中了24-105L的焦段和is,把这支镜头出手了。

这两支tamron镜头的唯一美中不足就是tamron的质量控制可能没有Canon好,个体差异较大。所以选购时候最好找容易退换的商家。

我的摄影器材史——史前时代

归类于: Uncategorized — tyning at 11:55 pm on 星期一, 三月 12, 2007

呵呵,我写的顺序看来就是random walk,想到哪里写到哪里。三国已经过了,西晋还
没想到怎么写。那就让我们穿越时空,先回到蛮荒的史前时代吧。

小时候,我们家的经济条件一直不好。那时候的大学不像现在高教改革以后三天两头涨
工资,父母微薄的收入要管全家人的吃喝,还有农村的爷爷奶奶,姥爷姥姥的生活费,
根本就不可能有余钱去玩摄影这种奢侈的小资爱好。不过老爸倒是爱好兴趣广泛的人,
虽然没有相机,但是业余也研究过基础的摄影理论,小时候经常找有相机的朋友,同事
借个相机来给我拍照。那些相机现在已经不记得什么牌子了,好像有红梅的,有珠江的
,有单反机,也有那种皮腔的折叠机。我小时候一直觉得折叠机很酷,觉得能收起来很
方便。现在家里还有不少小时候的底片和洗出来的照片,有6×6的,也有135的。那时候
好像印像都没有放大机的,也许是放大机印的贵,因为我记得我的照片都是多数都是那
种邮票那么大的,就跟大头照似的。

我们家的第一台相机应该是类似今天的Holga之类的东西。那是84年我小学一年级的暑
假,老爸去北京开会,顺便带我去玩专门买的。牌子啥的我肯定是记不清了,也许根本
就没有牌子。数年后,后来经过我的解剖,那机器就一个塑料镜头,八成就是一片。快
门时间固定,光圈似乎可以调节,镜头上有个塑料环,上面印着一个类似lady’s room
门口的女士头像,一个三人合影的icon,一个山/树的icon。那时候不懂是干吗的,反
正老爸就告诉我拍单人都用女人头像,拍合影就用三人icon,拍风景就用那个山/树形
状的icon。现在想来,应该是调节光圈。机器的快门是不可调的,用120的胶片,右边
用个旋钮卷片,没有计数。那个旋钮转一圈就是一张。那次去北京,我们用这个破相机
拍了不少照片,不过质量都不行,反正是比以前老爸借的相机拍的差远了,片子都是灰
灰的,而且似乎及其还有点漏光。总是,按照现在时髦的说话,那是相当的Lomo。现在
这些底片都留在家里,我打算下次回国去都带来扫描了,儿时的记忆弥足珍贵。

拥有第一台真正意义上的相机是初二。那个时候学校开业余兴趣选修课,可以学计算机
(就是用中华学习机学BASIC),学养花,学摄影。计算机我爸实验室里不缺,那时候有
286了,比中华学习机好玩多了;养花都是女生去学,我一个男生跑去会被人怀疑是贾
宝玉;于是我就去学摄影了。正好那个时候武汉照相机厂准备关门大吉,最后一批积压
的双反折价甩卖给区教育局,家里没有相机学摄影的孩子可以二十人刀买一个。90年的
时候二十人刀说大不大,说小不小。当时家里的经济条件已经有了改善,冰箱彩电也都
有了,所以这二十人刀老爸老妈很爽快地支持了。

我用的那台机器后来很可惜送给乡下的穷亲戚了。不过神奇的是现在居然还有google到
那个型号的相机的照片。

这个机器的鼻祖就是德国的Rolleicord,是Rollei公司搞得一种廉价型号。上海照相机
厂首先用海鸥牌仿制,似乎现在还在生产。在改革开放初期,全国是只要是个地方就搞
自己的照相机厂,电视机厂,洗衣机厂,电冰箱厂。武汉自认为自己至少在华中地区是
工业老大,自然也是不能缺的,于是也搞了个照相机厂,生产友谊牌双反。武汉人做东
西既没有上海人精细,又没有广东人精明,所以在80年代后期,这些厂就陆陆续续倒闭
了,于是就有了我花20人刀捡中幅相机。有趣的是那个时候我一直觉得自己的相机是落
后的老古董,看见别的同学用海鸥DF-1或者凤凰205之类的特别羡慕,根本不知道什么
是底片大就是硬道理。一个可能的原因是,当时我家门口的那家小冲印店哪有什么120
的彩色胶卷卖,只有角落里有些无人问津的120公元的黑白片,所以我的相机就只能拍
黑白了,特别羡慕别人的135相机能拍彩色片。现在想想,那个时候从中幅上路,居然
做梦都想要135;现在玩135觉得不过瘾,削减脑袋要上中幅,人生果然就是有一个接一
个的挤进城,又挤出城的折腾组成的。如果当时要有个人告诉我有中幅的RVP或者E100
用,我估计就不会有这番折腾了。

上课的教材是区教育局内部印的,那个年代的东西印刷质量都烂得很,所以样片基本上
没法看。不过上了一个学期棵,还是学到了不少东西。明白了光圈,快门,景深,胶片
感光度这些技术术语,也学到了一些基本构图理论,什么井字格,1/3律,对角线构图
,S型构图,视觉中心,视觉导引线。总之,就是后来看纽摄,觉得那些东西都是似曾
相识的。我现在已经不记得当年我拍的那几卷公元黑白是不是自己有意识的去构图,不
过当时我拍片子懂得光圈优先和看景深表示一定的。因为那个双反的机器左边的调焦旋
钮上有景深标尺,我每次都会很注意的去看它。那个时候自然没有什么测光标用,所以
基本上就靠书上叫的口诀。现在已经不太急得了,反正就是从阳光十六法则演变出来的,
加上什么雪地加几挡,背光加几挡之类的。

上了高中,家里买了一台好像是叫做Tom牌的傻瓜机,有内置闪光灯。于是我终于实现
了从中幅向135的退化,从全手动向全电子傻瓜化的堕落。史前时代就这样结束了。

03/12/07 开吹5D+24-105L,兼大幅试机

归类于: Uncategorized — tyning at 11:54 pm on 星期一, 三月 12, 2007

今天真不爽,就打算自己用个5D,被一群人讽刺了一番。那就索性WS一番,放开胆子放
毒,不怕毒不死你们。

今天天气暖和了,终于有机会把4×5拿去出玩了一番,5D+24-105L用来做数码测光proof。

回来以后把胶片冲洗出来比较了一下:

大幅用的是国产公元100黑白底片,Kodak HC-110 H配方冲洗,然后Epson 4990
1200dpi和2400dpi两种分辨率扫描,photoshop略加对比度,并作usm锐化。
5D拍raw文件,然后用Adobe Lightroom直接转黑白。

拍摄技术参数是:

5D f/8, 1/100s,开IS,手持
4×5 f/16, 1/25s,三脚架

为了公平比较,把5D的照片upsample到照片中的建筑物与4×5的扫描照片类似大小。

这个和5D upsample到等同4×5 1200dpi扫描的照片(警告,文件很大)

这个是4×5底片按1200dpi扫描后经ps修整然后存成的jpg文件

这个是截取中心1000×1000的部分直接比较

2400dpi的图片实在太大,原图就不上了,这个是中间部分的比较,5D基本上upsample
了250%。

呵呵,我就不下什么结论了,让片子说话。5D能达到什么画质水平,比较了心理就有数
。当然了,4×5如果用专用低扫或者滚筒,应该能有些提高。不过照5D这个水平,Canon
在展会上做广告能把照片打印一面墙那么大也不是吹的。

最后,驳斥一下所谓全副边角不行的歪理邪说和24-105L是狗头的奇谈怪论。上面有5D
upsample以后的片子,下面有原片

边角的树枝,草地可以自己睁大了眼睛仔细看。

03/09/07 继续讨论全副CCD防抖的可实现性

归类于: Uncategorized — tyning at 11:49 pm on 星期一, 三月 12, 2007

目前的主要的分歧就集中在了,CCD需要移动的range是不是会超出135镜头的成像圈。

前面有很多同学做了计算,有人说会,有人说不会。

其实这个问题最简单的办法就是做个简单的实验,用300-400mm的镜头在1/30s~1/50s的
快门
速度手持拍一张照片,看看那个motion blur kernel到底有多大。

我刚刚把EF70-300/4-5.6 IS USM装到20D上用1/30s试了一张,因为我们这里讨论的是
motion
blur kernel实际的物理尺寸,所以和是不是全副,还有crop factor都无关。我们的目
的是
测量300mm的135镜头手持1/30拍摄的时候到底blur多少个像素。

图见附件,我crop了中央的200×200范围。可以看出来,blur kernal <图片边长的1/10
,也就是说<20pixel。我们就坐保守估计,算作20pixel。

20D的pixel pitch大约是6.5um,我们算7um。那么也就是抖动的blur kernel实际在
20×7=140um左右。再给个裕量,翻一倍,算300um。

这也就是说,只要CCD能够上下左右各有300um的移动范围既可以有效地实现AS。这个范
围已经还在目前135镜头的成像圈之内。

前面tableau还有我的一些分析,得出的数据在毫米量级,我觉得主要是没有考虑到快
门打开的时间其实很短,在1/30s这个量级,因为手抖得运动速度不快,所以只要AS系
统的反应速度足够快既可,位移量无需很大。

这个和望远镜的IS系统不一样在于望远镜是连续观测,所以必须要能补偿足够大移动量
,但是相机是个snapshot的系统。

下一页 »